Any day now, South Carolina is going to fire a warning shot across the bow of the attempted Big Government takeover of our fisheries. It’s going to do so with a resolution “to oppose and refuse to recognize or enforce the coastal and marine spatial plans created in South Carolina pursuant to the authority of the National Ocean Council (NOC).”
“Enviros are going to hate it, but it will pass,” a source tells me.
The feds insist that regional planning bodies, assisted by the NOC, will decide how our public waters are to be used in a “bottom up” process. Supposedly, intent is to reduce user conflicts via “marine spatial planning.”
In reality, the NOC will be a “top down” dictate of where we can and cannot fish. Aside from asserting an anti-fishing agenda, if allowed to stand, it will be an integral part of a power grab by this administration, designed to control every aspect of our lives. (Another part of that strategy is The White House Rural Council, a land-based equivalent of the NOC.)
To voice opposition for this federal intrusion and to stand up for fishermen, state Rep. Mike Pitts introduced this resolution into the South Carolina legislature.
Legislators in other coastal states likely will follow his lead. Intent is to provide a united front of states opposing the NOC, as is happening with Obamacare, the attempted government takeover of health care.
Here is the resolution:
A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
TO OPPOSE AND REFUSE TO RECOGNIZE OR ENFORCE THE COASTAL AND MARINE SPATIAL PLANS CREATED IN SOUTH CAROLINA PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF THE NATIONAL OCEAN COUNCIL.
Whereas, the National Ocean policy calls for a Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning process to regulate activities in waters owned and managed by this State; and
Whereas, Executive Order 13547 signed by President Barack Obama on September 30, 2011, circumvents Congressional action to promote a predetermined agenda of water uses; and
Whereas, the South Carolina General Assembly recognizes that without adequate scientific evidence to support Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning, this planning will have a detrimental effect on the coastal economies of our State; and
Whereas, the necessity for the zoning of aquatic uses and the existence of conflicts among uses of aquatic and coastal resources has not been proven factual; and
Whereas, the South Carolina General Assembly is uncertain that "federal, state, and tribal authorities" who are to staff Regional Planning Bodies designated to formulate Coastal and Marine Spatial Plans will adequately represent all stakeholders during the development of those plans; and
Whereas, Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning has failed to ensure the right of the public to access aquatic resources for legitimate conservation activities and recreational uses; and
Whereas, nevertheless, the South Carolina General Assembly recognizes the authority of the United States government to manage recreational fishing as a sustainable activity in federally controlled waters as stated in Presidential Executive Order 12962 as amended by Presidential Executive Order 13474, and, subsequently, the State of South Carolina will continue to manage and protect recreational fishing as a sustainable activity in any relevant conservation or management areas that fall under the authority of this State. Now, therefore,
Be it resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:
That the members of the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, by this resolution, oppose and refuse to recognize or enforce the Coastal and Marine Spatial Plans created in South Carolina pursuant to the authority of the National Ocean Council.