The rusty crayfish is but one of several species that threaten Missouri streams.
It appears that the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) and Conservation Commission might be on the verge of weakening the regulation that it implemented in March 2012 to protect Missouri streams from invasive crayfish. If it does so, native ecosystems, especially smallmouth bass streams, likely will pay the price for this concession to the Missouri Farm Bureau (MFB) and the aquaculture industry.
Those two special interests pushed hard against the original regulation. Last year, they also collected signatures statewide against the move to prohibit the import, sale, and purchase of live crayfish for use as fishing bait, as well as for pond stocking and as pets for food.
And don’t forget that we have fish farmers (in other states) to thank for the Asian carp invasion now devastating fisheries throughout much of the country. They persuaded decision makers that the economic interests of aquaculture were more important than protecting ecosystems and native species from invasive species.
Why does Missouri need this regulation? Read these previous posts at Activist Angler:Missouri Needs Angler Support to Protect Fisheries from Invasive Crayfish and Invasive Crayfish Threaten Fisheries.
The amendment would allow the virile, or Northern, crayfish to be purchased for re-sale and sold for use as live bait. It still could not be imported from another state.
But research by MDC biologists indicates that the virile crayfish poses a significant threat. Here’s what they discovered in investigating crayfish invasions in Missouri:
“In February of 2012, U.S. National Park Service (NPS) biologists contacted MDC to report they had discovered an invasion of virile crayfish in the upper Current River watershed. They had discovered the species at 13 locations along the Current River watershed, totaling about 42 stream miles. Invasions were later confirmed by MDC staff, working with NPS staff.
“Current River is in the Ozark National Scenic Riverways, is one of the most recreationally important (canoeing, fishing, etc.) rivers in Missouri, and NPS staff were concerned about effects of this invasion on the river’s ecology and fishery. Nobody has yet studied this invasion to determine effects. However, NPS biologists noted several sites where virile crayfish outnumbered native crayfish and numbers of native spothanded crayfish (Orconectes punctimanus) were notably lower than expected (relative to observations from around the watershed).”
With research beginning only in 1999, biologists say that they aren’t yet certain how much of this species distribution in Missouri is native and how much is invasive. But they say that the virile crayfish is a “very hardy and adaptive species” that can be highly invasive.
Additionally, Charlie Rabeni, retired leader of the Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, says this:
“I have studied streams and crayfish in particular in Missouri Ozark streams for over 30 years. I am in total agreement with other experts who see any change to the prohibition of selling any species of crayfish to be potentially very harmful to stream biodiversity and to smallmouth bass and rock bass.”
If you want to help protect Missouri streams and smallmouth fisheries, voice your opposition to the amendment and support for the original regulation in a letter to the Missouri Conservation Commission (c/o Missouri Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65102.)
Here’s what is coming up in the process to amend the regulation, according to MDC:
“The annual code review where the Regulations Committee will be discussing the proposed amendment to the crayfish regulation will be on Wednesday February 13, 2013 at the Missouri Department of Conservation Headquarters building in Jefferson City starting at 10 a.m. in the auditorium.
“Once this amendment to the regulation is proposed, it will go to the Department’s Regulations Committee for review. With the approval of the Regulations Committee and Director, the proposed regulation changes would then be presented to the Conservation Commission for approval. If approved by the Commission, the regulation changes would then be filed with the Secretary of State’s Office and posted for public comment.” Pending comments, the new regulation would then take effect March 1, 2014.”